Abasiophilia

The fetish of disability, ultimately, can be broken into two categories; the dominant and the submissive. This can be in multiple positions as well, with either party fitting into either role, and can go further still with those who desire becoming disabled.

That may sound unusual.

Let's go through the classic psych, then my theories.

Some of the more classic beliefs as far as what could have sparked this desire within a person are as follows.

• Imprinting. This is actually pretty interesting, and is a concept spread over much of psychology. It's believed that things we see and feel when we are young imprint on our minds, and can cause various changes in the mind and lifestyle of the future us. So the sight of someone in a wheelchair early in our lives can spark a feeling of wanting to be with someone who is bound by the same restrictions, or vice versa, where a hospital visit could spark a desire to become disabled themselves. 
• An inferiority complex. People who had been made to feel inferior in childhood could actually fork into the same two paths. 
• Attention seeking. People who are disabled tend to garner more sympathy, and get more attention and help in life. Young people who see or interact with various disabled people could feel that it's easier to get attention, and it becomes part of how they view attraction.

There are others, but I want to talk about my theories a bit. Because that's really why I made this blog in the first place, after all.

It's hard to argue about the points brought up above. It makes perfect sense, and it can explain the behavior in both devotees, those who wish to be with disabled folks, as well as people who would rather be disabled. But, my theories actually call into question other fetishes as they would almost certainly play a part in the fun.

Sexology seems to consider each individual 'paraphilia', and seems unwilling to consider that they could be borne of various other outlying causes.

An example. A submissive boy loves being tied up. Adores it. It makes him feel completely alive. So...wouldn't losing the use of a limb, or your mobility, or anything else, pretty much accomplish the same thing, on a deeper scale? Or a dominant woman, who loves having her sub serve her, but doesn't feel like the consistent acts of carefully constructing rope bondage patterns are an effective use of her time? For either of these, the main implication is restriction, restraint, or loss of mobility. There isn't a lot of difference when you break them down into their most basic parts, really.

So what do these three images have in common? None of them are really difficult to move, though they would have a more difficult time moving without the help of another person. They are dependent on someone else, at least for ease of motion, if not for more depending on their own abilities, (save for the second. She is fully dependent.), and it can still become a submissive/dominant duology.

And with that, I think it's enough of my jibber jabber. We'll probably end up coming back to this, but I think tomorrow I want to look more into a deeper theory I have of inter-connectivity between fetishes and desires, and their conceptual origins.

Thank you for reading. If you liked it, please visit my patreon, where I'll be working on an actual game utilizing all the information I'm providing here. It'll be fun, sexy, and a great way to test out the waters on your own.